https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199216 The Supreme Court upheld the Division Bench's decision to set aside the rejection of a candidate's appointment as Director Marketing in the State Trading Corporation by the Appointments Committee of the Cabinet (ACC). The Court emphasized the need for the ACC to provide reasons for its decisions to prevent arbitrariness, ruling that the lack of reasons for disregarding the recommendation made by the Public Enterprises Selection Board (PESB) rendered the rejection invalid. The appeal was dismissed with no costs imposed, underscoring the importance of transparency in administrative decisions related to appointments. en-us Fri, 27 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 23 Feb 2018 11:43:22 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199216 The Supreme Court upheld the Division Bench's decision to set aside the rejection of a candidate's appointment as Director Marketing in the State Trading Corporation by the Appointments Committee of the Cabinet (ACC). The Court emphasized the need for the ACC to provide reasons for its decisions to prevent arbitrariness, ruling that the lack of reasons for disregarding the recommendation made by the Public Enterprises Selection Board (PESB) rendered the rejection invalid. The appeal was dismissed with no costs imposed, underscoring the importance of transparency in administrative decisions related to appointments. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 27 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199216