https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199215 Leave to defend in a summary suit under Order 37 Rule 3(3) CPC may be granted either unconditionally or on just terms. The defence was not found to be very strong, but it was sufficient to justify conditional leave rather than refusal. Because the debt was treated as fully secured, a deposit condition was considered unnecessary. The Court instead directed a time-bound schedule for filing the written statement and then regulated discovery, inspection, and hearing of the suit. Conditional leave to defend was therefore granted on the terms imposed. en-us Mon, 12 Dec 1988 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 23 Feb 2018 11:36:35 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199215 Leave to defend in a summary suit under Order 37 Rule 3(3) CPC may be granted either unconditionally or on just terms. The defence was not found to be very strong, but it was sufficient to justify conditional leave rather than refusal. Because the debt was treated as fully secured, a deposit condition was considered unnecessary. The Court instead directed a time-bound schedule for filing the written statement and then regulated discovery, inspection, and hearing of the suit. Conditional leave to defend was therefore granted on the terms imposed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 12 Dec 1988 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199215