<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (2) TMI 1262 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199214</link>
    <description>A later Special Rule prescribing a fixed quota and a no-backlog arrangement for Medical Officer (Homeopathy) appointments prevails over the earlier General Rule on quota computation. Because Rule 2 of the General Rules makes a repugnant Special Rule controlling for that service, the prescribed ratio was applied to the vacancies notified rather than to the cadre strength. Earlier decisions under the General Rules were inapplicable since they involved a different statutory sequence. The operative principle is that a specific later Special Rule governs recruitment allocation for the particular service.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Feb 2018 11:05:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=510142" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (2) TMI 1262 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199214</link>
      <description>A later Special Rule prescribing a fixed quota and a no-backlog arrangement for Medical Officer (Homeopathy) appointments prevails over the earlier General Rule on quota computation. Because Rule 2 of the General Rules makes a repugnant Special Rule controlling for that service, the prescribed ratio was applied to the vacancies notified rather than to the cadre strength. Earlier decisions under the General Rules were inapplicable since they involved a different statutory sequence. The operative principle is that a specific later Special Rule governs recruitment allocation for the particular service.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199214</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>