<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Court Upholds Validity of Scrutiny Assessment Notice u/s 143(2) Despite Assessee&#039;s Absence for Delivery.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=38098</link>
    <description>Selection of case of scrutiny assessment - validity of notice - Attainment of requirement u/s 143(2) - deemed service of notice - non-availability of the Assessee to receive the notice sent by registered post as many as on two occasions - decided in favor of revenue - SC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Feb 2018 09:23:25 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Feb 2018 09:23:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=510137" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Court Upholds Validity of Scrutiny Assessment Notice u/s 143(2) Despite Assessee&#039;s Absence for Delivery.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=38098</link>
      <description>Selection of case of scrutiny assessment - validity of notice - Attainment of requirement u/s 143(2) - deemed service of notice - non-availability of the Assessee to receive the notice sent by registered post as many as on two occasions - decided in favor of revenue - SC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Feb 2018 09:23:25 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=38098</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>