<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (2) TMI 1462 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356041</link>
    <description>The Court dismissed the appeal challenging the ITAT&#039;s order on accrued interest on loans classified as Non-performing Assets for the assessment year 2012-13. It held that tax should only be paid on income actually received, particularly in the case of non-performing assets, as clarified in previous decisions. Therefore, when an asset is classified as non-performing, it does not yield revenue, and the obligation to pay tax does not arise.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2018 16:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=510108" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (2) TMI 1462 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356041</link>
      <description>The Court dismissed the appeal challenging the ITAT&#039;s order on accrued interest on loans classified as Non-performing Assets for the assessment year 2012-13. It held that tax should only be paid on income actually received, particularly in the case of non-performing assets, as clarified in previous decisions. Therefore, when an asset is classified as non-performing, it does not yield revenue, and the obligation to pay tax does not arise.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356041</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>