<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (2) TMI 1453 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356032</link>
    <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal, granting the appellant a refund of excess duty paid due to deductions for non-achievement of Guaranteed Powder Factor (GPF). The tribunal found that the appellant had not passed on the central excise duty to the recipient, overcoming the hurdle of unjust enrichment. The impugned orders were set aside, and the appeals were allowed with consequential reliefs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Feb 2018 07:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=510099" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (2) TMI 1453 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356032</link>
      <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal, granting the appellant a refund of excess duty paid due to deductions for non-achievement of Guaranteed Powder Factor (GPF). The tribunal found that the appellant had not passed on the central excise duty to the recipient, overcoming the hurdle of unjust enrichment. The impugned orders were set aside, and the appeals were allowed with consequential reliefs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356032</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>