<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (2) TMI 1441 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356020</link>
    <description>The High Court admitted the appeal challenging the dismissal of the application for restoration of the appeal before the Tribunal. The Court emphasized the need for substantial justice over hyper-technicality, criticizing the Tribunal&#039;s failure to allow parties to argue their cases on merits. Despite the belated restoration application, the Court quashed the order, directing the Tribunal to restore the appeal for adjudication on merits in accordance with the law, recognizing the appellant&#039;s bona fide actions in rectifying compliance lapses promptly. The decision underscored the importance of upholding justice and fairness in legal proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2018 12:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=510087" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (2) TMI 1441 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356020</link>
      <description>The High Court admitted the appeal challenging the dismissal of the application for restoration of the appeal before the Tribunal. The Court emphasized the need for substantial justice over hyper-technicality, criticizing the Tribunal&#039;s failure to allow parties to argue their cases on merits. Despite the belated restoration application, the Court quashed the order, directing the Tribunal to restore the appeal for adjudication on merits in accordance with the law, recognizing the appellant&#039;s bona fide actions in rectifying compliance lapses promptly. The decision underscored the importance of upholding justice and fairness in legal proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356020</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>