https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356011 Writ petitions challenging reassessment orders on denial of input tax credit under the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act were not entertained because statutory appeals were already pending and the appellate remedy was efficacious. The High Court noted that a prior binding decision had settled the input tax credit issue in favour of assessees, so the appellate authority could apply that precedent while deciding the appeals. The petitions were therefore disposed of by directing the assessee to pursue the pending appeals, and the appellate authority was required to hear and decide them on merits without insisting on pre-deposit. en-us Wed, 07 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 23 Feb 2018 06:00:50 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356011 Writ petitions challenging reassessment orders on denial of input tax credit under the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act were not entertained because statutory appeals were already pending and the appellate remedy was efficacious. The High Court noted that a prior binding decision had settled the input tax credit issue in favour of assessees, so the appellate authority could apply that precedent while deciding the appeals. The petitions were therefore disposed of by directing the assessee to pursue the pending appeals, and the appellate authority was required to hear and decide them on merits without insisting on pre-deposit. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Wed, 07 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356011