<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (12) TMI 1148 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199208</link>
    <description>The High Court of Allahabad ruled in favor of the petitioner, holding that the notice issued under section 143(2) of the Income Tax Act was indeed barred by limitation as per the Proviso to Section 143(2)(ii) of the Act. The court emphasized the importance of serving the notice within the prescribed period and invalidated the service on the authorized representative, deeming it necessary for the notice to be served directly on the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Feb 2018 08:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=510067" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (12) TMI 1148 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199208</link>
      <description>The High Court of Allahabad ruled in favor of the petitioner, holding that the notice issued under section 143(2) of the Income Tax Act was indeed barred by limitation as per the Proviso to Section 143(2)(ii) of the Act. The court emphasized the importance of serving the notice within the prescribed period and invalidated the service on the authorized representative, deeming it necessary for the notice to be served directly on the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199208</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>