<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (7) TMI 437 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199206</link>
    <description>When a party dies after the hearing has concluded but before judgment is pronounced, Order XXII Rule 6 CPC prevents abatement and the reserved judgment retains full legal effect. In a suit for specific performance, the claimant must independently plead and prove continuous readiness and willingness to perform essential contractual obligations under Section 16(c) of the Specific Relief Act, assessed from the claimant&#039;s conduct and surrounding circumstances. Failure to comply with directions such as deposit or bank guarantee, together with conduct indicating reluctance to perform, justifies refusal of equitable relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Jul 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Feb 2018 17:36:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=510061" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (7) TMI 437 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199206</link>
      <description>When a party dies after the hearing has concluded but before judgment is pronounced, Order XXII Rule 6 CPC prevents abatement and the reserved judgment retains full legal effect. In a suit for specific performance, the claimant must independently plead and prove continuous readiness and willingness to perform essential contractual obligations under Section 16(c) of the Specific Relief Act, assessed from the claimant&#039;s conduct and surrounding circumstances. Failure to comply with directions such as deposit or bank guarantee, together with conduct indicating reluctance to perform, justifies refusal of equitable relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Jul 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199206</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>