<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1957 (8) TMI 30 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199204</link>
    <description>The court upheld the decree against the appellant, dismissing the appeal with costs. The plaintiff was entitled to the commission as he had fulfilled his part of the contract by securing a willing purchaser. The liability was personal and not contingent on the actual sale or the actions of the other directors.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Aug 1957 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Feb 2018 17:15:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=510056" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1957 (8) TMI 30 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199204</link>
      <description>The court upheld the decree against the appellant, dismissing the appeal with costs. The plaintiff was entitled to the commission as he had fulfilled his part of the contract by securing a willing purchaser. The liability was personal and not contingent on the actual sale or the actions of the other directors.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Aug 1957 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199204</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>