<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (2) TMI 532 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199202</link>
    <description>The court upheld the validity of the modified Voluntary Retirement Scheme (VRS) introduced by a public-sector enterprise, rejecting claims of lack of transparency and discrimination. It concluded that the petitioners were estopped from challenging the scheme after accepting compensation under it. The court dismissed the petition, with each party bearing their own costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Feb 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Feb 2018 16:58:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=510052" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (2) TMI 532 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199202</link>
      <description>The court upheld the validity of the modified Voluntary Retirement Scheme (VRS) introduced by a public-sector enterprise, rejecting claims of lack of transparency and discrimination. It concluded that the petitioners were estopped from challenging the scheme after accepting compensation under it. The court dismissed the petition, with each party bearing their own costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Feb 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199202</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>