<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (2) TMI 22 - RAJASTHAN High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11992</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed all four appeals, upholding the Tribunal&#039;s decision. It found no issue with the Tribunal&#039;s order and emphasized the importance of determining whether the lease amount should be classified as income from business or other sources. The court supported the reassessment based on the merits of the case, affirming the validity of reopening the assessment under the relevant provisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Feb 2010 12:19:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=51004" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (2) TMI 22 - RAJASTHAN High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11992</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed all four appeals, upholding the Tribunal&#039;s decision. It found no issue with the Tribunal&#039;s order and emphasized the importance of determining whether the lease amount should be classified as income from business or other sources. The court supported the reassessment based on the merits of the case, affirming the validity of reopening the assessment under the relevant provisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11992</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>