<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1940 (7) TMI 20 - BEFORE THE PRIVY COUNCIL</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199194</link>
    <description>An award requires registration only if, on its true construction, it itself purports or operates to create, declare, assign, limit or extinguish an interest in immovable property under the Registration Act, 1908. Here, the disputed clause was treated as preserving the existing contractual position until payment, so the award was not a registrable instrument and was not affected by Section 49. The earlier jurisdictional ruling did not make the construction of the award res judicata, because that issue was not finally adjudicated and reasons supporting a refusal of jurisdiction do not bind as res judicata on matters beyond the court&#039;s competence. Section 11 CPC therefore did not apply.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jul 1940 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Feb 2018 15:18:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=510037" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1940 (7) TMI 20 - BEFORE THE PRIVY COUNCIL</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199194</link>
      <description>An award requires registration only if, on its true construction, it itself purports or operates to create, declare, assign, limit or extinguish an interest in immovable property under the Registration Act, 1908. Here, the disputed clause was treated as preserving the existing contractual position until payment, so the award was not a registrable instrument and was not affected by Section 49. The earlier jurisdictional ruling did not make the construction of the award res judicata, because that issue was not finally adjudicated and reasons supporting a refusal of jurisdiction do not bind as res judicata on matters beyond the court&#039;s competence. Section 11 CPC therefore did not apply.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jul 1940 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199194</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>