<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (10) TMI 405 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199190</link>
    <description>A suit instituted on behalf of a corporation without a board resolution authorising its filing was held to lack proper authorisation under Order 29 Rule 1 CPC. The memorandum and articles of association vested the power to commence or defend proceedings in the directors collectively, but no resolution was passed empowering the institution of the suit. In those circumstances, the person who filed the proceeding was not duly authorised, and the corporation could not be treated as having validly instituted the action. The objection therefore succeeded and the suit was not maintainable for want of proper authorisation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Feb 2018 18:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=510026" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (10) TMI 405 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199190</link>
      <description>A suit instituted on behalf of a corporation without a board resolution authorising its filing was held to lack proper authorisation under Order 29 Rule 1 CPC. The memorandum and articles of association vested the power to commence or defend proceedings in the directors collectively, but no resolution was passed empowering the institution of the suit. In those circumstances, the person who filed the proceeding was not duly authorised, and the corporation could not be treated as having validly instituted the action. The objection therefore succeeded and the suit was not maintainable for want of proper authorisation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199190</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>