https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199189 A company suit filed by a director without a board resolution was treated as incompetent because Order 29 Rule 1 CPC permits verification of pleadings but does not itself authorise institution of proceedings; the suit was therefore held not maintainable. The tenant also failed to obtain protection under the Tamil Nadu City Tenants Protection Act because that statutory right applies only where the tenancy is of land alone and the tenant has put up the superstructure. As the property was held to be a tenancy of a building with appurtenant land, relief under section 9 was unavailable and the possession decree was set aside. en-us Mon, 03 Oct 1994 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 22 Feb 2018 13:11:08 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199189 A company suit filed by a director without a board resolution was treated as incompetent because Order 29 Rule 1 CPC permits verification of pleadings but does not itself authorise institution of proceedings; the suit was therefore held not maintainable. The tenant also failed to obtain protection under the Tamil Nadu City Tenants Protection Act because that statutory right applies only where the tenancy is of land alone and the tenant has put up the superstructure. As the property was held to be a tenancy of a building with appurtenant land, relief under section 9 was unavailable and the possession decree was set aside. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 03 Oct 1994 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199189