<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (2) TMI 1422 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356001</link>
    <description>Anti-dumping review upheld the scope of the subject goods after the record showed metallurgical coke was assessed by physical, chemical and tariff characteristics, and no legally sustainable basis existed to exclude coke with higher or lower ash content. Captive-consumption producers were validly excluded from the domestic industry because their production was for internal use, not commercial competition with imports, and their economics differed from sales-oriented producers. Injury and causal link were also sustained, as the evidence showed increased imports, greater import share, price undercutting and price underselling, while alternative causes did not displace the import-related injury findings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Feb 2018 06:41:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=509981" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (2) TMI 1422 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356001</link>
      <description>Anti-dumping review upheld the scope of the subject goods after the record showed metallurgical coke was assessed by physical, chemical and tariff characteristics, and no legally sustainable basis existed to exclude coke with higher or lower ash content. Captive-consumption producers were validly excluded from the domestic industry because their production was for internal use, not commercial competition with imports, and their economics differed from sales-oriented producers. Injury and causal link were also sustained, as the evidence showed increased imports, greater import share, price undercutting and price underselling, while alternative causes did not displace the import-related injury findings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356001</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>