<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (2) TMI 1422 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356001</link>
    <description>The Tribunal accepted the restoration of the appeal dismissed for non-prosecution, challenging Customs Notification No.53/2016 imposing antidumping duty on low ash metallurgical coke. The Tribunal upheld the imposition of antidumping duty, finding a causal link between increased imports and injury to the domestic industry. It agreed with the exclusion of certain producers from the investigation and dismissed the appeal, supporting the DA&#039;s conclusions on the subject goods and injury to the domestic industry.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Feb 2018 06:41:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=509981" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (2) TMI 1422 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356001</link>
      <description>The Tribunal accepted the restoration of the appeal dismissed for non-prosecution, challenging Customs Notification No.53/2016 imposing antidumping duty on low ash metallurgical coke. The Tribunal upheld the imposition of antidumping duty, finding a causal link between increased imports and injury to the domestic industry. It agreed with the exclusion of certain producers from the investigation and dismissed the appeal, supporting the DA&#039;s conclusions on the subject goods and injury to the domestic industry.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356001</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>