<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (2) TMI 1419 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355998</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the petition for winding up the respondent company, emphasizing that the debt was disputed, not admitted. Bona fide disputes over the debt precluded a winding-up order, as non-payment of a disputed debt does not constitute neglect to pay under the Companies Act. The court highlighted the respondent&#039;s financial difficulties and ongoing legal proceedings, ultimately ruling in favor of the respondent, dismissing the petition and discharging the notice, with each party bearing their own costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Feb 2018 06:41:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=509978" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (2) TMI 1419 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355998</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the petition for winding up the respondent company, emphasizing that the debt was disputed, not admitted. Bona fide disputes over the debt precluded a winding-up order, as non-payment of a disputed debt does not constitute neglect to pay under the Companies Act. The court highlighted the respondent&#039;s financial difficulties and ongoing legal proceedings, ultimately ruling in favor of the respondent, dismissing the petition and discharging the notice, with each party bearing their own costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355998</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>