https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355997 Where parties, through counsel, reach a consensus in court and the claim is adjusted or satisfied during the proceedings, the second part of Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC applies and a separate written compromise signed by the parties is not necessary. The Delhi High Court noted that the settlement was recorded after several hearings, with counsel confirming the terms on instructions, and that the orders expressly proceeded on consent. The appellants' later attempt to resile from the recorded settlement was treated as an afterthought. The compromise was held valid and lawful, and the consent orders were held binding on the appellants. en-us Tue, 13 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 21 Feb 2018 16:51:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355997 Where parties, through counsel, reach a consensus in court and the claim is adjusted or satisfied during the proceedings, the second part of Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC applies and a separate written compromise signed by the parties is not necessary. The Delhi High Court noted that the settlement was recorded after several hearings, with counsel confirming the terms on instructions, and that the orders expressly proceeded on consent. The appellants' later attempt to resile from the recorded settlement was treated as an afterthought. The compromise was held valid and lawful, and the consent orders were held binding on the appellants. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 13 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355997