https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355997 The court upheld the validity and legality of the compromise recorded by the Single Judge under Order XXIII Rule 3 of the CPC, emphasizing that agreements reached during court proceedings, even without being in writing and signed by parties, are valid. The court found that the appellants had benefited from the consent order and dismissed their appeal, concluding that the consent order was lawful and binding. en-us Tue, 13 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 21 Feb 2018 16:51:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355997 The court upheld the validity and legality of the compromise recorded by the Single Judge under Order XXIII Rule 3 of the CPC, emphasizing that agreements reached during court proceedings, even without being in writing and signed by parties, are valid. The court found that the appellants had benefited from the consent order and dismissed their appeal, concluding that the consent order was lawful and binding. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 13 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355997