<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (2) TMI 1412 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355991</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants in a tax liability dispute involving cleaning services, supply of bed rolls, outdoor catering service, and supply of newspapers. The Tribunal found the original authority&#039;s interpretations incorrect in several instances, leading to the unsustainable tax liabilities. Penalties and demands for an extended period were set aside, and penalties were waived for renting of immovable property service. However, a short payment under Business Auxiliary Service was upheld due to insufficient evidence. Overall, the appellants were successful in challenging various tax liabilities and penalties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2018 14:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=509971" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (2) TMI 1412 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355991</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants in a tax liability dispute involving cleaning services, supply of bed rolls, outdoor catering service, and supply of newspapers. The Tribunal found the original authority&#039;s interpretations incorrect in several instances, leading to the unsustainable tax liabilities. Penalties and demands for an extended period were set aside, and penalties were waived for renting of immovable property service. However, a short payment under Business Auxiliary Service was upheld due to insufficient evidence. Overall, the appellants were successful in challenging various tax liabilities and penalties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355991</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>