https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355987 The appeals were partly allowed. The Tribunal held that the Service Tax liability under Business Auxiliary Service (BAS) on branch office expenses could not be sustained, while the tax liability on advertising services was upheld but restricted to the normal period. Penalties imposed on the appellant were set aside, and the appellant was deemed eligible for consequential relief as per law. en-us Fri, 12 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 22 Feb 2018 06:40:42 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355987 The appeals were partly allowed. The Tribunal held that the Service Tax liability under Business Auxiliary Service (BAS) on branch office expenses could not be sustained, while the tax liability on advertising services was upheld but restricted to the normal period. Penalties imposed on the appellant were set aside, and the appellant was deemed eligible for consequential relief as per law. Case-Laws Service Tax Fri, 12 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355987