<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (2) TMI 1403 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355982</link>
    <description>The Court found that the show cause notice issued without considering the petitioner&#039;s reply to audit objections and without mandatory pre-notice consultation was challengeable. The Court allowed the Writ Petition, set aside the notice, and remanded the matter for fresh consideration, directing the respondent to provide a hearing to the petitioner&#039;s representative(s) and proceed lawfully. No costs were imposed on the parties, and the Miscellaneous Petition was closed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Oct 2019 11:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=509962" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (2) TMI 1403 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355982</link>
      <description>The Court found that the show cause notice issued without considering the petitioner&#039;s reply to audit objections and without mandatory pre-notice consultation was challengeable. The Court allowed the Writ Petition, set aside the notice, and remanded the matter for fresh consideration, directing the respondent to provide a hearing to the petitioner&#039;s representative(s) and proceed lawfully. No costs were imposed on the parties, and the Miscellaneous Petition was closed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355982</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>