<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (2) TMI 1402 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355981</link>
    <description>The tribunal dismissed both appeals, affirming the impugned order based on the evidence of clandestine removal of goods without duty payment and upheld the penalties imposed. The appellant&#039;s arguments regarding duty liability, clandestine manufacture, and Cenvat Credit entitlement were considered but were not found to be persuasive in light of the evidence presented.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2018 10:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=509961" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (2) TMI 1402 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355981</link>
      <description>The tribunal dismissed both appeals, affirming the impugned order based on the evidence of clandestine removal of goods without duty payment and upheld the penalties imposed. The appellant&#039;s arguments regarding duty liability, clandestine manufacture, and Cenvat Credit entitlement were considered but were not found to be persuasive in light of the evidence presented.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355981</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>