https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355980 The Tribunal partially upheld the impugned order, sustaining the demand for duty and penalty partially while remanding the case for re-quantification and reassessment of penalties based on revised computations. The allegations of clandestine clearance were found inflated and unsustainable, limiting the demand to a reasonable quantity. The appellant's challenge regarding the accuracy of the stock-taking method and natural justice violations were dismissed, with the Tribunal affirming the validity of the order. en-us Wed, 21 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 22 Feb 2018 06:40:22 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355980 The Tribunal partially upheld the impugned order, sustaining the demand for duty and penalty partially while remanding the case for re-quantification and reassessment of penalties based on revised computations. The allegations of clandestine clearance were found inflated and unsustainable, limiting the demand to a reasonable quantity. The appellant's challenge regarding the accuracy of the stock-taking method and natural justice violations were dismissed, with the Tribunal affirming the validity of the order. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 21 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355980