https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355969 The Tribunal set aside the impugned order and allowed the appeals, finding the Department's allegations of clandestine removal unsupported by sufficient evidence. Emphasizing the importance of thorough investigations and corroborative evidence, the Tribunal highlighted the necessity of substantial proof to establish charges of clandestine removal. Relying solely on third-party evidence without verification or corroboration was deemed insufficient in legal proceedings, as seen in the cases of M/s Balaji v/s CCE Raipur and Continental Cement Company v. Union of India. en-us Thu, 11 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 22 Feb 2018 06:40:01 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355969 The Tribunal set aside the impugned order and allowed the appeals, finding the Department's allegations of clandestine removal unsupported by sufficient evidence. Emphasizing the importance of thorough investigations and corroborative evidence, the Tribunal highlighted the necessity of substantial proof to establish charges of clandestine removal. Relying solely on third-party evidence without verification or corroboration was deemed insufficient in legal proceedings, as seen in the cases of M/s Balaji v/s CCE Raipur and Continental Cement Company v. Union of India. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 11 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355969