<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (2) TMI 1387 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355966</link>
    <description>Denial of Cenvat credit on capital goods and input services used in a distillery unit was found to require fresh examination where the assessee&#039;s sugar unit enjoyed area-based exemption but the distillery was claimed to function separately. The record indicated duty payment on certain distillery clearances, which undermined the Revenue&#039;s position that the entire undertaking operated as a single excise assessee under one registration for all products. On that basis, the existing findings were held insufficient to sustain the credit denial, and the matter was remanded to the Original Authority for reconsideration of the unit-wise eligibility for credit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Feb 2018 06:39:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=509946" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (2) TMI 1387 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355966</link>
      <description>Denial of Cenvat credit on capital goods and input services used in a distillery unit was found to require fresh examination where the assessee&#039;s sugar unit enjoyed area-based exemption but the distillery was claimed to function separately. The record indicated duty payment on certain distillery clearances, which undermined the Revenue&#039;s position that the entire undertaking operated as a single excise assessee under one registration for all products. On that basis, the existing findings were held insufficient to sustain the credit denial, and the matter was remanded to the Original Authority for reconsideration of the unit-wise eligibility for credit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355966</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>