<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (2) TMI 1386 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355965</link>
    <description>The term &quot;similar&quot; in an exemption notification was interpreted broadly, meaning goods need only resemble each other in relevant respects and need not be identical in form or tariff classification. On that construction, zinc powder cleared into the domestic tariff area was treated as similar to zinc ingots exported by the assessee because the notification did not impose a narrower definition. The denial of exemption was therefore unsustainable, and the assessee was entitled to the benefit of the notification.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Feb 2018 06:39:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=509945" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (2) TMI 1386 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355965</link>
      <description>The term &quot;similar&quot; in an exemption notification was interpreted broadly, meaning goods need only resemble each other in relevant respects and need not be identical in form or tariff classification. On that construction, zinc powder cleared into the domestic tariff area was treated as similar to zinc ingots exported by the assessee because the notification did not impose a narrower definition. The denial of exemption was therefore unsustainable, and the assessee was entitled to the benefit of the notification.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355965</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>