https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355961 The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, directing the fifth respondent to lift the attachment of the bank account since the entire tax amount was paid. The second respondent was instructed to authorize the third respondent to consider the Revision Petition. No coercive action was to be taken against the petitioner pending the Revision Petition decision. The court ordered acceptance of monthly returns without imposing costs, emphasizing a decision based on merits. en-us Thu, 04 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 22 Feb 2018 06:39:30 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355961 The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, directing the fifth respondent to lift the attachment of the bank account since the entire tax amount was paid. The second respondent was instructed to authorize the third respondent to consider the Revision Petition. No coercive action was to be taken against the petitioner pending the Revision Petition decision. The court ordered acceptance of monthly returns without imposing costs, emphasizing a decision based on merits. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Thu, 04 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355961