<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (2) TMI 1378 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355957</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the Tax Appeal, affirming the approach to calculate the indexed cost of acquisition for capital gains tax based on the cost at which the previous owner acquired the asset. The judgment clarified the interpretation of section 48 Explanation (iii) and emphasized the importance of the deeming fiction in section 49 for determining the cost of acquisition in cases involving gifted assets.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 May 2019 16:38:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=509937" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (2) TMI 1378 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355957</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the Tax Appeal, affirming the approach to calculate the indexed cost of acquisition for capital gains tax based on the cost at which the previous owner acquired the asset. The judgment clarified the interpretation of section 48 Explanation (iii) and emphasized the importance of the deeming fiction in section 49 for determining the cost of acquisition in cases involving gifted assets.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355957</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>