https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199169 Where the genuineness of signatures on transfer deeds is central to alleged violations under the PFUTP, SAST and PIT Regulations, and the existing record is insufficient, factual verification through additional evidence is required. The Tribunal held that the dispute over signature authenticity could not be properly resolved on the material before it, especially in light of a forensic comparison report. The impugned penalty order was quashed and the matter remanded for de novo adjudication, with the appellant to be given a reasonable opportunity to present further documents and case materials. en-us Wed, 23 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 21 Feb 2018 21:18:57 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199169 Where the genuineness of signatures on transfer deeds is central to alleged violations under the PFUTP, SAST and PIT Regulations, and the existing record is insufficient, factual verification through additional evidence is required. The Tribunal held that the dispute over signature authenticity could not be properly resolved on the material before it, especially in light of a forensic comparison report. The impugned penalty order was quashed and the matter remanded for de novo adjudication, with the appellant to be given a reasonable opportunity to present further documents and case materials. Case-Laws Companies Law Wed, 23 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199169