<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (6) TMI 1191 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199175</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the petition filed by the Corporate Debtor under Section 10 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code due to concerns of potential abuse of the insolvency process. The judgment highlighted the extensive collateral offered by the Corporate Debtor, including immovable properties, fixed deposits, and personal guarantees of directors. The court emphasized the need for thorough assessment by the Adjudicating Authority to prevent misuse of insolvency proceedings, ultimately citing potential irreparable loss to the Consortium of Banks and unwarranted protection to borrowers and guarantors as reasons for dismissal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2018 21:18:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=509906" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (6) TMI 1191 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199175</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the petition filed by the Corporate Debtor under Section 10 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code due to concerns of potential abuse of the insolvency process. The judgment highlighted the extensive collateral offered by the Corporate Debtor, including immovable properties, fixed deposits, and personal guarantees of directors. The court emphasized the need for thorough assessment by the Adjudicating Authority to prevent misuse of insolvency proceedings, ultimately citing potential irreparable loss to the Consortium of Banks and unwarranted protection to borrowers and guarantors as reasons for dismissal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199175</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>