<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (1) TMI 1523 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199164</link>
    <description>The tribunal upheld the first appellate order allowing claimed depreciation on a motor car registered in a director&#039;s name but purchased with company funds and used for business purposes. The tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, citing relevant case laws and jurisdictional High Court rulings supporting the depreciation claim for vehicles owned by the company. The appeals were dismissed as the tribunal found no reason to interfere with the first appellate order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 31 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2018 17:53:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=509895" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (1) TMI 1523 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199164</link>
      <description>The tribunal upheld the first appellate order allowing claimed depreciation on a motor car registered in a director&#039;s name but purchased with company funds and used for business purposes. The tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, citing relevant case laws and jurisdictional High Court rulings supporting the depreciation claim for vehicles owned by the company. The appeals were dismissed as the tribunal found no reason to interfere with the first appellate order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199164</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>