https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199160 Breach of the Election Symbols (Reservation and Allotment) Order, 1968 in symbol allotment was held capable of amounting to non-compliance with the Constitution, the Act, or rules or orders made thereunder for section 100(1)(d)(iv) of the Representation of the People Act, 1951, because the Symbols Order operates within the statutory election framework. In election pleadings, material facts are those needed to constitute the cause of action, while particulars supply detail; the petition need not plead evidence or matters within the respondent's knowledge. The challenged averments were therefore not liable to be struck out for want of material facts or sufficient particulars. en-us Tue, 02 Nov 1982 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 08 Jul 2026 15:13:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199160 Breach of the Election Symbols (Reservation and Allotment) Order, 1968 in symbol allotment was held capable of amounting to non-compliance with the Constitution, the Act, or rules or orders made thereunder for section 100(1)(d)(iv) of the Representation of the People Act, 1951, because the Symbols Order operates within the statutory election framework. In election pleadings, material facts are those needed to constitute the cause of action, while particulars supply detail; the petition need not plead evidence or matters within the respondent's knowledge. The challenged averments were therefore not liable to be struck out for want of material facts or sufficient particulars. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 02 Nov 1982 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199160