https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199153 The court held that it had territorial jurisdiction based on the cause of action partly arising within its jurisdiction. It found the termination of the contract and issuance of a global tender notice to be illegal and procedurally improper, as the respondents acted arbitrarily without following principles of natural justice. The court emphasized that legitimate expectation does not create enforceable rights in contractual matters. The court quashed the impugned orders and directed the respondents to reconsider the matter after providing the petitioner with a hearing, without awarding costs. en-us Thu, 28 Mar 1996 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 21 Feb 2018 15:03:31 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199153 The court held that it had territorial jurisdiction based on the cause of action partly arising within its jurisdiction. It found the termination of the contract and issuance of a global tender notice to be illegal and procedurally improper, as the respondents acted arbitrarily without following principles of natural justice. The court emphasized that legitimate expectation does not create enforceable rights in contractual matters. The court quashed the impugned orders and directed the respondents to reconsider the matter after providing the petitioner with a hearing, without awarding costs. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 28 Mar 1996 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199153