https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199149 In second appeal, the High Court's jurisdiction is confined to cases involving a specifically framed substantial question of law under Section 100 CPC, and concurrent findings of fact cannot be disturbed by mere reappreciation of evidence. Findings of sub-letting and nuisance based on evidence were concurrent factual findings, and the High Court was not justified in setting them aside without first identifying and deciding a substantial question of law. The result was restoration of the eviction decree passed by the courts below and setting aside of the High Court's judgment. en-us Tue, 07 Sep 1999 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 21 Feb 2018 14:46:58 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199149 In second appeal, the High Court's jurisdiction is confined to cases involving a specifically framed substantial question of law under Section 100 CPC, and concurrent findings of fact cannot be disturbed by mere reappreciation of evidence. Findings of sub-letting and nuisance based on evidence were concurrent factual findings, and the High Court was not justified in setting them aside without first identifying and deciding a substantial question of law. The result was restoration of the eviction decree passed by the courts below and setting aside of the High Court's judgment. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 07 Sep 1999 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199149