https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199147 Appeals against respondents other than respondent No. 7 were dismissed because no show cause notice had been served on them, and service of the foundational notice was treated as a prerequisite for proceeding. The Court relied on the Tribunal's finding that the remaining respondents had not been served, so the appeals could not continue against them. Notice was issued only to respondent No. 7, Bentum Industries, as the proper party to be proceeded against. en-us Mon, 22 Mar 1999 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 21 Feb 2018 14:42:12 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199147 Appeals against respondents other than respondent No. 7 were dismissed because no show cause notice had been served on them, and service of the foundational notice was treated as a prerequisite for proceeding. The Court relied on the Tribunal's finding that the remaining respondents had not been served, so the appeals could not continue against them. Notice was issued only to respondent No. 7, Bentum Industries, as the proper party to be proceeded against. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 22 Mar 1999 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199147