https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199140 A lease deed reserving to the lessor an unconditional right to resume the land on notice was not a lease in perpetuity; it was treated, at most, as a tenancy at will. A court-confirmed auction sale vested the leasehold interest in the purchaser on confirmation, so no further registered transfer deed was required, and the sale certificate was sufficient evidence of title. The auction transfer was not void for lack of prior notice to or consent of the lessor because a court auction sale fell within transfer by operation of law rather than a voluntary inter vivos transfer. The claim of forcible dispossession was not proved and was also time-barred. en-us Mon, 28 May 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 19 Jan 2024 12:30:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199140 A lease deed reserving to the lessor an unconditional right to resume the land on notice was not a lease in perpetuity; it was treated, at most, as a tenancy at will. A court-confirmed auction sale vested the leasehold interest in the purchaser on confirmation, so no further registered transfer deed was required, and the sale certificate was sufficient evidence of title. The auction transfer was not void for lack of prior notice to or consent of the lessor because a court auction sale fell within transfer by operation of law rather than a voluntary inter vivos transfer. The claim of forcible dispossession was not proved and was also time-barred. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 28 May 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199140