<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (4) TMI 525 - COMPANY LAW BOARD, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199137</link>
    <description>The petition for rectification of the register of members was dismissed by the Company Law Board due to the summary nature of proceedings under Section 111 of the Companies Act. The Board found that the complex and disputed facts required elaborate evidence and trial, suggesting that the petitioners should pursue their claims in a civil court. No order as to costs was made in this case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2018 12:33:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=509858" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (4) TMI 525 - COMPANY LAW BOARD, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199137</link>
      <description>The petition for rectification of the register of members was dismissed by the Company Law Board due to the summary nature of proceedings under Section 111 of the Companies Act. The Board found that the complex and disputed facts required elaborate evidence and trial, suggesting that the petitioners should pursue their claims in a civil court. No order as to costs was made in this case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199137</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>