https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355929 The Court rejected the petitioner's challenge to a reassessment order for the assessment year 2009-10, emphasizing the importance of timely objections and compliance with tax proceedings. It noted the petitioner's lack of response to notices and stressed the need for foreign companies to cooperate with Indian tax authorities. The Court highlighted the availability of avenues for redressal under the Income Tax Act and concluded that the petitioner failed to establish grounds for challenging the order directly in the High Court. The writ petition was dismissed for lack of merit, without costs. en-us Mon, 12 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 21 Feb 2018 06:29:45 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355929 The Court rejected the petitioner's challenge to a reassessment order for the assessment year 2009-10, emphasizing the importance of timely objections and compliance with tax proceedings. It noted the petitioner's lack of response to notices and stressed the need for foreign companies to cooperate with Indian tax authorities. The Court highlighted the availability of avenues for redressal under the Income Tax Act and concluded that the petitioner failed to establish grounds for challenging the order directly in the High Court. The writ petition was dismissed for lack of merit, without costs. Case-Laws Income Tax Mon, 12 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355929