https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355928 The court dismissed the writ petition seeking an extension of time for payment of the third installment under the Income Declaration Scheme Rules, 2016, emphasizing the mandatory nature of the payment schedule and lack of sufficient grounds for relaxation. The petitioner's reasons for seeking an extension, including health issues and forgetfulness, were deemed insufficient. The court highlighted that age and health conditions did not warrant an extension, and the petitioner's claims were not justifiable. The judgment allowed for the possibility of filing a separate petition for adjustment or refund of the amounts paid, without commenting on the specific outcome of such a petition. en-us Fri, 09 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 31 May 2018 16:53:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355928 The court dismissed the writ petition seeking an extension of time for payment of the third installment under the Income Declaration Scheme Rules, 2016, emphasizing the mandatory nature of the payment schedule and lack of sufficient grounds for relaxation. The petitioner's reasons for seeking an extension, including health issues and forgetfulness, were deemed insufficient. The court highlighted that age and health conditions did not warrant an extension, and the petitioner's claims were not justifiable. The judgment allowed for the possibility of filing a separate petition for adjustment or refund of the amounts paid, without commenting on the specific outcome of such a petition. Case-Laws Income Tax Fri, 09 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355928