<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (2) TMI 1345 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355924</link>
    <description>The ITAT Kolkata held that the penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act amounting to Rs. 1,43,747/- could not be sustained due to a defective notice issued under Section 274. Relying on the Supreme Court&#039;s decision in SSA&#039;s Emerald Meadows, the Tribunal found the ambiguity in the notice to be a significant defect, invalidating the penalty proceedings. Consequently, the appeal was allowed, and the penalty was canceled on 16-02-2018.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2018 06:29:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=509823" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (2) TMI 1345 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355924</link>
      <description>The ITAT Kolkata held that the penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act amounting to Rs. 1,43,747/- could not be sustained due to a defective notice issued under Section 274. Relying on the Supreme Court&#039;s decision in SSA&#039;s Emerald Meadows, the Tribunal found the ambiguity in the notice to be a significant defect, invalidating the penalty proceedings. Consequently, the appeal was allowed, and the penalty was canceled on 16-02-2018.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355924</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>