<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (2) TMI 1339 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355918</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling the reassessment invalid as it was based on a change of opinion without new material. The addition for transport expenses without tax deduction was deemed unjustified as each payment was below the threshold for TDS deduction under section 194C, with no contract between the assessee and transporters. The Tribunal held that section 194C did not apply, allowing the appeal and emphasizing reassessment without new material is impermissible.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2018 06:29:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=509817" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (2) TMI 1339 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355918</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling the reassessment invalid as it was based on a change of opinion without new material. The addition for transport expenses without tax deduction was deemed unjustified as each payment was below the threshold for TDS deduction under section 194C, with no contract between the assessee and transporters. The Tribunal held that section 194C did not apply, allowing the appeal and emphasizing reassessment without new material is impermissible.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355918</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>