https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355917 The Tribunal upheld the disallowances related to employees' contributions to Provident Fund and Employees' State Insurance, cash payment to a vendor under Section 40A(3), and commission expenses paid to a third party. The appellant's arguments citing judicial pronouncements were not deemed sufficient to overturn the disallowances, as the Tribunal found the explanations lacking and not meeting the required standards. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, affirming the disallowances based on the appellant's failure to adequately justify the contested expenses. en-us Fri, 02 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 21 Feb 2018 06:29:21 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355917 The Tribunal upheld the disallowances related to employees' contributions to Provident Fund and Employees' State Insurance, cash payment to a vendor under Section 40A(3), and commission expenses paid to a third party. The appellant's arguments citing judicial pronouncements were not deemed sufficient to overturn the disallowances, as the Tribunal found the explanations lacking and not meeting the required standards. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, affirming the disallowances based on the appellant's failure to adequately justify the contested expenses. Case-Laws Income Tax Fri, 02 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355917