<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (9) TMI 1426 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199129</link>
    <description>CENVAT credit on common inputs used in both exempted and dutiable goods was held not to be liable for disallowance merely for failure to maintain separate accounts, where the issue had already been decided in the assessee&#039;s own case and in a similar matter in its favour. The Tribunal followed those earlier rulings and concluded that the demand requiring reversal of credit could not be sustained. The denial of credit was set aside and the assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2018 06:29:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=509810" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (9) TMI 1426 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199129</link>
      <description>CENVAT credit on common inputs used in both exempted and dutiable goods was held not to be liable for disallowance merely for failure to maintain separate accounts, where the issue had already been decided in the assessee&#039;s own case and in a similar matter in its favour. The Tribunal followed those earlier rulings and concluded that the demand requiring reversal of credit could not be sustained. The denial of credit was set aside and the assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199129</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>