<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (2) TMI 1324 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355903</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT AHMEDABAD ruled in three appeals involving service tax liability on discounts and incentives. The Tribunal held that service tax on discounts was not applicable as it involved sale and purchase, not promotion, citing Trade Wings Ltd. case. However, incentives from software developers were subject to service tax under Business Auxiliary Service, following Ram Krishna Travels Pvt Ltd. case and D-paul&#039;s case. The demands on the first issue were set aside, and on the second issue, limited to the normal period of limitation. No penalties were imposed, and the matters were remanded for computation, with the appeals disposed of based on the cited judgments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 May 2018 16:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=509795" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (2) TMI 1324 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355903</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT AHMEDABAD ruled in three appeals involving service tax liability on discounts and incentives. The Tribunal held that service tax on discounts was not applicable as it involved sale and purchase, not promotion, citing Trade Wings Ltd. case. However, incentives from software developers were subject to service tax under Business Auxiliary Service, following Ram Krishna Travels Pvt Ltd. case and D-paul&#039;s case. The demands on the first issue were set aside, and on the second issue, limited to the normal period of limitation. No penalties were imposed, and the matters were remanded for computation, with the appeals disposed of based on the cited judgments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355903</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>