https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355896 Threshold rejection of a settlement application for alleged non-compliance with the return-filing condition was held unjustified because the correspondence and disclosures indicated that the applicant had explained its processing activity, job work and relevant returns. The factual aspects bearing on compliance with the statutory preconditions required scrutiny, particularly where duty liability had been admitted. The matter was therefore remanded to the Settlement Commission for fresh consideration on merits in accordance with law. en-us Fri, 19 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 21 Feb 2018 06:27:20 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355896 Threshold rejection of a settlement application for alleged non-compliance with the return-filing condition was held unjustified because the correspondence and disclosures indicated that the applicant had explained its processing activity, job work and relevant returns. The factual aspects bearing on compliance with the statutory preconditions required scrutiny, particularly where duty liability had been admitted. The matter was therefore remanded to the Settlement Commission for fresh consideration on merits in accordance with law. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 19 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355896