https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355885 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Hyderabad ruled in favor of the appellants/assessees in appeals related to differential central excise duty demands. The Tribunal held that the demands were unsustainable as the assesses were eligible for exemption under Notification No.4/2007-CE, citing precedents in similar cases. The appeals were allowed, setting aside the demands. However, the appeal regarding non-imposition of penalty under Section 11AC against Penna Cement Industries Ltd. was rejected since their appeals were successful on merits. All appeals were disposed of accordingly with any consequential relief granted. en-us Tue, 30 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 21 Feb 2018 06:26:54 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355885 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Hyderabad ruled in favor of the appellants/assessees in appeals related to differential central excise duty demands. The Tribunal held that the demands were unsustainable as the assesses were eligible for exemption under Notification No.4/2007-CE, citing precedents in similar cases. The appeals were allowed, setting aside the demands. However, the appeal regarding non-imposition of penalty under Section 11AC against Penna Cement Industries Ltd. was rejected since their appeals were successful on merits. All appeals were disposed of accordingly with any consequential relief granted. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 30 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355885