https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355879 In a second round of litigation concerning overlapping excise penalties, the Tribunal held that sustaining penalty under Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act was sufficient to meet the ends of justice, so a separate penalty under Rule 173Q of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 was unnecessary. The Rule 173Q penalty was set aside, while the Section 11AC penalty was maintained. en-us Thu, 14 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 21 Feb 2018 06:26:26 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355879 In a second round of litigation concerning overlapping excise penalties, the Tribunal held that sustaining penalty under Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act was sufficient to meet the ends of justice, so a separate penalty under Rule 173Q of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 was unnecessary. The Rule 173Q penalty was set aside, while the Section 11AC penalty was maintained. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 14 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355879