https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199121 Delay in filing a challenge to a forfeiture notification was condonable because Section 29(2) of the Limitation Act applied the condonation provisions to the special limitation period, and the applicants showed lack of timely knowledge supported by the circumstances. On the merits, forfeiture under the criminal procedure provisions was tested against the grounds stated in the notification, but the impugned passages were not abusive, intemperate, or likely to promote enmity or disturb public tranquillity. The Court treated temperate criticism of a religious or historical figure as insufficient to attract liability under the penal provision, and the forfeiture was therefore set aside. en-us Mon, 21 Jan 1980 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 20 Feb 2018 17:16:12 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199121 Delay in filing a challenge to a forfeiture notification was condonable because Section 29(2) of the Limitation Act applied the condonation provisions to the special limitation period, and the applicants showed lack of timely knowledge supported by the circumstances. On the merits, forfeiture under the criminal procedure provisions was tested against the grounds stated in the notification, but the impugned passages were not abusive, intemperate, or likely to promote enmity or disturb public tranquillity. The Court treated temperate criticism of a religious or historical figure as insufficient to attract liability under the penal provision, and the forfeiture was therefore set aside. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 21 Jan 1980 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199121