https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199112 The revisional authority under the U. P. rent-control statute may consider hardship, long possession and the practical effect of eviction when deciding whether eviction is inexpedient under the proviso to Section 7-A, and such broad discretion is not confined to narrow or exhaustive criteria. The contractual attempt to waive the tenant's protection under Section 3(1) was ineffective because that provision reflects a public policy against eviction without the prescribed permission; an agreement designed to defeat it is void under Section 23 of the Contract Act. The rent-control protection therefore remained operative, and eviction could not proceed without compliance with the statutory permission requirement. en-us Mon, 29 Jul 1974 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 14 Jul 2025 10:25:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199112 The revisional authority under the U. P. rent-control statute may consider hardship, long possession and the practical effect of eviction when deciding whether eviction is inexpedient under the proviso to Section 7-A, and such broad discretion is not confined to narrow or exhaustive criteria. The contractual attempt to waive the tenant's protection under Section 3(1) was ineffective because that provision reflects a public policy against eviction without the prescribed permission; an agreement designed to defeat it is void under Section 23 of the Contract Act. The rent-control protection therefore remained operative, and eviction could not proceed without compliance with the statutory permission requirement. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 29 Jul 1974 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199112